patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

MUSD Bars Body Building Over 'Scantily Clad Women'

A local gym owner said the Monrovia Unified School District superintendent told a body-building contest promoter that she didn't want the high school associated with "scantily clad women."

 

Foothill Gym owner and competitive body builder Brian Whelan said the school district has rejected a proposal to bring a body building competition to Monrovia High School because the superintendent didn't want "scantily clad women" associated with the school.

A promoter wanted to stage the West Coast Classic Bodybuilding and Figure contest at MHS during next year's summer break but was rebuffed by Monrovia Unified School District Superintendent Linda Wagner, Whelan said. Whelan said Wagner called the contest promoter and told his assistant that he would not be allowed to rent the school for the event.

"She just said, 'We do not want our school associated with scantily clad women,'" Whelan said. "Her view on it was very, very clear."

Whelan took exception to that characterization of female body building and defended it as a sport. Whelan's wife Jennifer is also a competitive body builder--she's won the West Coast Classic twice--and he said that only professional body builders would be taking part in the competition, which the promoter wanted to hold over the 2012 summer break.

Wagner did not return an email or a phone message left her assistant requesting comment on this story.

The contest, which would have required a paid ticket for entry, could have brought in thousands of dollars for MHS boosters, Whelan said. Last year's event drew about 1,200 spectators, and Whelan said $5 of each ticket sold would have gone to the boosters.

In the past, the competition has been held at other nearby high schools like El Monte High and Rosemead High, Whelan said.

Lonnie Teper, the contest's promoter, said he visited MHS over the summer and wanted to move the competition to Monrovia High from El Monte High because the city offers better amenities. His assistant submitted the paperwork when the school year started, and that's when she got the call from Wagner, Teper said.

Teper said the description of female body builders as scantily clad women was "demeaning" to people like Jennifer Whelan, who he said trains intensely for the competitions.

"I think that's pretty demeaning to Jennfier Whelan who along with Brian is a pillar in that community," Teper said. "These people are training really hard and watching what they eat and they're an inspiration to people."

Teper compared the bikinis worn by body builders to the outfits worn by many high school athletes like swimmers and track runners.

"When you're judging somebody's physique, yes, they have to be in bikinis," he said. "But you see bikinis everywhere you go."

Whelan said the contest would have been a boon to the city's businesses as well. The last event promoted by Teper, a writer for Iron Man Magazine and an instructor at Pasadena City College, filled up an entire hotel, Whelan said.

Teper said he was put off by the superintendent's reaction and plans to host the event elsewhere.

"They want me to have the show at El Monte. They're welcoming me with open arms," he said. "I don't want the facility if they don't want me there."

Related Topics: Monrovia, Monrovia High School, and body building
Do you think the contest should be allowed at MHS? Tell us in the comments.

Iris Moreau

7:17 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Wow! Wagner is at it again. So sad that she spends so much of her time vetoing this kind of thing. She really needs to get a life!

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

10:55 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Maybe she has a very wild life? You know what they say about Pious people, (Making a hypocritical display of virtue.)

Christy Gordon

7:25 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Shouldn't this decision be up to more than just one person, who obviously had no clue what this sport is about? Do we really need to protect high school students from bikinis?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Raymond Aguirre

11:55 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

If we did, they would have to get rid of the swimming pool, and all dance groups at the school. Once again, narrowminded thinking.

jimenez

7:39 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

MUSD is low on funds. Why is it only the decision of Linda Wagner and not any one else. Seems rather selfish to me!!!

Reply

Holly Hale

7:59 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

A) What about the scantily dressed men? B) Clearly this woman has never walked on campus and seen how the girls dress these days. It's all about being sexy with push up bras and low cut blouses (why their mothers let them out of the house is beyond me).
C) Body building is not about sex and seduction. It's about muscle and fitness. The people who participate work hard to get into that kind of shape. It takes years of work and special diet to do it naturally.
Sorry Linda, your intentions are misguided. Maybe you should require Hi. School students to wear uniforms instead.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gerald Pool

8:41 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Thanks Holly. My thoughts exactly! On first read, it seemed to me that the superintendent wouldn't mind seeing an all men's competition...

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Dan Abendschein

8:53 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

You beat me to the punch here Holly.... if anything, it appears to me the male body builder is more scantily clad. Seems a little unfair to single out female body builders.

Comment_arrow

Mark

5:28 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I tend to agree with you both.

Lara L. Larramendi

8:11 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Body building is a sport and this event is "drug free", which sends a strong message to students and the population as a whole.
There are many misconceptions about body building and "scantily clad women" is one of them. Apologies are in order to our own Jennifer Wheelan and the other women that compete as members of Foothill Gym.
Bringing this annual competition to Monrovia High School and Monrovia would be a benefit all the way around. Positive publicity and much needed revenues to both MUSD and the City are just an example. I say that the Board should have a say in this decision.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Raymond Aguirre

11:58 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Yes, but the MUSD would rather raid the funds of no-profit organizations like MYBL, and AYSO to make up their loss of revenue. My apologies to Jennifer Wheeland as well.

sayitisntso

8:20 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Under California Law, anyone may require that this matter be placed on the School Boards Agenda and then it will be up to the MUSD Board to make this call, not the Superintendent.

Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code) Section 54950.

School Districts (Education Code) Section 35145.5.
It is the intent of the Legislature that members of the public be able to place matters directly related to school district business on the agenda of school district governing board meetings.

Reply

Frank "frazgo" Zgonc

8:42 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Actually, this is quite an opportunity for MUSD for some fund raising. Also, the groups on campus like Band, Sport Supporters, Theater and who knows what else could make a buck by hosting car washes or who knows what else during the event to capitalize on the traffic generated on campus as well.

Reply

Stephanie Rogers

8:58 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

It seems to me that Ms. Wagner is very mis-informed. Has she attended a High School Wrestling competition ? Aren't the outfits for this sport a little risque for the prunes of this world? Money raised for the school in this way beats Chuckie Cheese pizza any day.

Reply

Ralph Walker

9:51 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Great timing Monrovia School Board Elections Nov. 8,2011 do you know who is running . What is the policy or procedure for booking events at the high school

Reply

Donna Baker

9:53 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Not only would this competition set a good example for high schoolers, but Brian Whelan's story is one of determination and hard work. Having spent 13 months in a wheelchair and then having to re-learn how to walk is an amazing example for anyone to face adversity and never give up. I can't imagine a better role model for high school kids. And on a side note, it's ridiculous to consider that a bodybuilding competition would be considered "sexual" in nature. It's a sport!

Reply

Kate K.

9:56 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

People, are we reading all the words here ?... This piece says that 1) Whelan said that 2) the promoter said that 3) Ms. Wagner said. That's THREE steps from the reputed source of the statement! Does that kind of hearsay, which wasn't verified, warrant this kind of outrage, regardless of what its about? 3rd-source "information" is usually considered "Gossip"... even in journalism. If I say my neighbor told me she heard the mayor say the world is ending, does that make it a newsworthy item? Or could it just be BS? In this case, its proving to be a VERY GOOD way for this body building event to get PR here in town. (Would most of us have known or cared about it, if not for this little 'she-said, they-said" item ?) Why don't we all wait for FACTS and direct-source reporting before assuming that the Superindendent (and not her assistant, for example, who returns many of the calls to MUSD, for example) spoke with the still un-named/unidentified promoter). I'd like to see some direct-surce reporting on this: Facts, please?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rog L.

10:39 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Ms Wagner would certainly respond to the requests for a statement if she was misquoted wouldn't she? How long should we wait for her to decide that a statement is warranted?

Comment_arrow

Kate K.

11:16 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Roger, Ms. Wagner WAS NOT QUOTED! A quote is something direct from a person's lips or keyboard. A 3rd-hand mention is NOT a quote, and no one shold be held accountable for it. A paid public employee certainly should not put that at the top of his/her agenda, above the tasks the public has contracted him/her to do.

Comment_arrow

Rog L.

11:51 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Kate, first I never said she was misquoted. Second, what do you think the intent of the journalist's inquiry to her office was? I would guess he was actually attempting to get a 1st hand quote as we both agree he should. What are we to derive from Ms. Wagner not wanting to set the record straight, if in fact what was reported was not accurate.

Considering the current economics of the district, I expect this particular public employee to do everything in her power to address the shortfall of funds and get creative about making up for them with fund-raising rather than passing the buck to local non-profits. This is a resource of funds that she appears to have snubbed her nose at but I'll go ahead and wait to hear her true position before drawing my final conclusion.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Nathan McIntire

12:24 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Hi Kate, I spoke with the promoter's assistant directly before publishing this and she confirmed what Wagner said to her. I'd be happy to report the district's side of this if they respond to my repeated inquiries.

sayitisntso

10:44 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

The items will be placed on the agenda for discussion during the meeting of October 26. See you all there.

From: Linda Wagner [mailto:lwagner@monrovia.k12.ca.us]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 10:28 AM
To: Cyrus
Cc: Kris Mariconda
Subject: Re: Agenda Item for School Board

Thank you for your request. These items will be placed on the agenda for discussion during the meeting of October 26.

Linda Wagner
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Cyrus <cyrus@cyruskemp.com> wrote:
Dear MUSD Board,

I am requesting that two items be placed on the next MUSD Board Agenda as provided for in the following citing.

Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code) Section 54950.

School Districts (Education Code) Section 35145.5.
It is the intent of the Legislature that members of the public be able to place matters directly related to school district business on the agenda of school district governing board meetings.

Items for regular MUSD Board Meeting:

1. Whether to allow the staging of the West Coast Classic Bodybuilding and Figure contest at MHS during next year's summer break.

2. Develop a clear policy for the types of events that may be held on school property.

Please inform me of the date of the meeting that will have these two items on its agenda.

Sincerely
Cyrus Kemp

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rog L.

10:58 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

On the other hand, nice work!!

Dave Sparks

11:00 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Maybe in the downtime between bodybuilding events the MHS drama club can perform vignettes from Rent.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nicoline Conway

5:26 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I couldn't have said this better myself, Dave!

jake

11:23 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Thats what happens when you hire from the outside you never know what you are going to get. Bad move from the get go should have promoted within the district.

Reply

Kate K.

11:25 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

On additional reading, the offensive words are actually 4th-hand--- the promoter got the so-called "quote" from his assistant, an unnamed female.

Reply

Kate K.

11:32 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

The ISSUE here should really be whether Monrovia is renting the new high school facilities to for-profit commercial events, of any kind. Is that the case? Have other for-profit commercial enterprises rented our tax-built facilities ? If so, I certainly hope we, the taxpayers, are getting MORE than a mere $5 per person for the use of our nice, expenisive facilities. And I hope the money is going to us, all the taxpayers, via the school or city, which is paying for the upkeep of these facilities. Ticket money should not be going to the Boosters or some other small group.

Reply

Erin Thorn

12:40 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Bottom line is our schools and community need to find more creative ways to raise much needed funding to continue to provide the quality of life we all want. Too many school programs around the nation are being cut because we must follow this rule or the other. This would be an outstanding event for our schools and community.

Reply

Ralph Walker

2:16 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

What and what is the role of the Boosters of Monrovia High School

Reply

Karen Suarez

2:21 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

They look great! I hope they promote steroid free building. I hope someone asks them. That would be my only issue.

Reply

Charles

2:48 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

People: Maybe I am old fashioned, but isn't a school suppost to reflect the values of the community? What on earth does a bodybuilding competition have to do with getting my child into a good college? How will looking at musclemen and women promote better study habits? And why can't the community agree that the contest might be held at a more appropriate venue--like a bodybuilding club or gym? Then if Mr. Generous & his wife wants to give $5 from each ticket sold to the school, that would be a wonderful gesture.

Elections are in November-let's be sure to watch who on the board supports academics and who else supports almost anything BUT scholastic achievement? Or is that not the point of school anymore?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Iamsam

4:53 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

In agreement. It is nice that the Patch continues to promote the athletics of the high school but very have they gone and interviewed any of the various clubs, the math and science departments? What does body building have to do with school? Even if it is held in the summer students are on campus. Even elementary and middle school kids. Where does it end? If they allow this, they must allow an anything goes policy.

Comment_arrow

Brenda Winner

11:58 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

These competitions require discipline and good health habits something all students should learn. Besides the value of self worth and the betterment of a person. And Mr generous does give evey year to the school in any way we can.

Andy

3:21 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Is this how the board president supports the superintendent he hired? Way to throw her under the bus Ed! You can be sure I'll remember your lack of a spine in the coming elecition, and I'll be sure to remind my friends, acquaintences, coworkers, and anybody else who votes about it too. Monrovia deserves real leadership from the people we elect.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed Gililland

9:19 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Are you kidding me back at you Andy? No one threw Dr. Wagner under the bus. Cyrus requested the issue be placed on the agenda as he has every right to do. It would be illegal and irresponsible to do anything else. It would also violate the Brown Act if we made a decision on this or any other item on the agenda prior to open discussion of the item. Therefore, unless Cyrus decides to withdraw his request, it will be heard in open session and the Board will really consider if this decision by Dr. Wagner should be reversed. One of the key factors in that discussion will be that the campus will be closed for sandblasting and painting of the main building at the time this competition will take place. Nathan seems to have a knack for editing information to create conflict. I hope to sit down with him this week to talk about how we can honestly and openly share information so the correct information gets out the first time.

Gabriella

3:32 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Dear Cyrus Kemp-I look forward to hearing what you consider appropriate events for school property. Does my daughters need to see a bunch of people who are not students at school parade around for a totally unrelated purpose to school? What if this does happen, where will it end? Wet tshirt contests or poledancing competitions or something else that is not at all related to school or learning ? It dont matter if it happens in summer or in the fall school is for school and gyms are for body building and gym things.

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

4:47 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Dear Gabriella, I don't make the laws or rules but I will abide by them and support them. If I don't like a law then I will attempt to find a lawful way to change it. I do not think it is my or your place to censor the world in order to censor your daughters, that my dear is your job as a parent. I suppose you do not let your daughters go to the beach or public swimming pools because they will see the same two piece swim suits in those venues. If you go to the Gymnastic events or swimming events at schools or the Olympics you will see young girls dressed in very reveling wet outfits.

You probably only support The Free Speech Amendment as long as you agree with what's being said.

Comment_arrow

Brenda Winner

12:02 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Your comments and opinions are insulting. There is no comparison to wet tshirts and pole dancing here. But trying to explain this to you would be like going to a gunfight with a knife. There is just no way you could understand if this is how you feel. The only one who suffers unfortunately is your daughter.

Susan

3:39 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

It seems to me like once again the purpose of school is taking a back seat to sports. Yea it is great to win championships and have parades and rings and do bodybuilding contests but what about setting examples for kids who use their brains? Where are the parades for them?

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

4:52 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

There are as many or more competitions held for intellectual prowess as athletic ones, to name a few, debate, spelling, science, government, writing and on and on so where have you been. The parade has passed you by.

Comment_arrow

Erin Thorn

12:54 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

I know there is a rocket club that competes in a JPL contest every year and there is now an Academic Decathlon team that competes. Those probably don't cost anywhere near the amount of money that sports, band, drama and the like cost. Besides, the article said he was donating to "MHS boosters" or "the boosters" it did not specify Athletic/Big M boosters. There are a lot of booster clubs and it may very well be he intended to spread the wealth. The MASA is only about 4 years old and they were given a good sized start up grant and now a brand new science wing to get them going. Lastly, there has been one parade to celebrate a long sought after MHS Football CIF win that came after 10 trips to the finals, in like 80 years. No other school sport or organization had to fight that long and hard to get there. It was well deserved.

murry

3:46 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

what's this clown got against the musd and linda wagner anyway? looks like yet another hack writing job and at lot of smoke with no flame. don't know what the hidden agenda is but motives are pretty transparent. get a real journalism job blog boy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

4:56 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Businesses place paid ads and those ads are what pay the bills, economics 101.

megan tholes

3:52 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Article says the promoter teaches at Pasadena City College, why have they never let him hold the event there? Seriously??? Did anyone on the board besides superintendent ask why its more appropriate for a HS than on a college campus?

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

4:59 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

What's not appropriate about it, period? Seriously???

Comment_arrow

Brenda Winner

12:04 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

It has been held there before and it's not available this year.

Bob

4:22 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I spoke with Linda Wagner and she said that the truth is that the high school will be closed for campus-wide painting in June when the body building competition is supposed to take place. I agree with Mury's comment. Nathan McIntyre should get his facts straight before he writes his "articles".

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

5:01 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

If you belive Linda Wagner, at this stage, I have some land to sell you. Seriously???

Comment_arrow

Jerry Baker

5:32 pm on Tuesday, October 11, 2011

It's easy to check. Just make a California Public Records Act request for a copy of the notice to proceed on the sandblasting. That will tell you when and if it was approved - before or after the request to use the facilities for the competition.

sayitisntso

4:24 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Renting school space falls under “The Civic Center Act” which also promotes the use of school facilities for community recreation, but it has a much broader focus than the Community Recreation Act. Its purpose is to establish at each public school a space for citizens and organizations to engage in activities, including supervised recreation.
When the California Legislature enacted the Civic Center Act in 1917,
it declared:

[T]here is a civic center at each and every public school facility and grounds within the state

The California Civic Center Act

EDUCATION CODE
SECTION 38130

38130. This article shall be known and may be cited as the Civic
Center Act.

Call your MUSD Board members and share your feelings about the matter with them as it will be on the Oct,26th. Please take the time to attend that meeting to show your support.
Regular Board of Education Meetings are held on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:30 p.m. at the Monrovia Unified School District's Central Office at 325 East Huntington Drive, Monrovia, California.

THE MONROVIA BOARD OF EDUCATION
Contact Ed Gililland by phone at:(626) 359-2197
Contact Chris Rich by phone at (626) 485-6478
Contact Alex Zucco by phone at: (626) 806-6934
Contact Bryan Wong by phone at:(626) 688-8233

Reply

sayitisntso

4:27 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

EDUCATION CODE
SECTION 38130-38139

38134.
(e) In the case of entertainments or meetings where admission fees
are charged or contributions are solicited and the net receipts are
not expended for the welfare of the pupils of the district or for
charitable purposes, a charge shall be levied for the use of school
facilities or grounds which charge shall be equal to fair rental
value.

Reply

Charles

4:36 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Definitely good information sayitisntso. Thanks!!

CALL THE MONROVIA BOARD OF EDUCATION
Contact Ed Gililland by phone at:(626) 359-2197
Contact Chris Rich by phone at (626) 485-6478
Contact Alex Zucco by phone at: (626) 806-6934
Contact Bryan Wong by phone at:(626) 688-8233

TELL THEM THAT SCHOOL IS FOR LEARNING, AND BIKINI SHOWS ARE FOR STRIP BARS.

TELL THEM YOU KNOW THAT "COMMUNITY RECREATION" DOES NOT APPLY TO A BODYBUILDING COMPETITION, AND THAT THE CIVIC CENTER ACT DOES NOT APPLY (good try tho, sayitisntso!).

AND THEN TELL THEM YOU VOTE!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

5:20 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Hope to see you at the meeting and you are wrong about the Civic Center Act not applying to this group. But I would suspect you are used to being wrong.

Comment_arrow

Brenda Winner

1:24 pm on Monday, October 10, 2011

bikin shows are for strip bars???!! what an assinine remark!
You are really showing your true colors now.

Ethan

4:44 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Is this the part where we say "I'm mad as h*ll and I'm not going to take it anymore?"

Reply

Mark

5:17 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I have been following this for the past couple of hours and although I am not too familiar with these types of events they certainly do not seem like "strip bar" shows. I do know that our school rents out buildings for all kinds of things and gets paid a sizeable fee, whch is good for all aspects of the school. The article mentioned money for booster clubs which is a seperate thing and helps enormously with the costs involved in school activities. The comment made that our school is to be repainted in June is odd, its a brand new facility, just finished, I highly doubt that it would be time to repaint?. Anyone from the school care to comment on that point?
The last portion of the article seems to make most of this discussion a mute point:

Teper said he was put off by the superintendent's reaction and plans to host the event elsewhere.
"They want me to have the show at El Monte. They're welcoming me with open arms," he said. "I don't want the facility if they don't want me there."

I do feel though that future events should recieve more consideration and not be dismissed too easily. If the superintendent did say those words than perhaps she should clarify and express no intent to offend anyone who participates in what seems to be a very demanding sport.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Conway

7:54 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Monrovia High School is scheduled to be repainted this summer. Several brand new building were built and they don't need to be painted, but If you look at the older buildings they are in need of plaster repairs and repainting. They really look shabby, especially in contrast with the beautiful new buildings. For the entire campus to look good the repainting is essential.

Nicoline Conway

5:28 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

There are a lot more important things to get upset about.

Reply

sayitisntso

5:40 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Who's upset? People here are having healthy debates and good clean disagreements.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kate K.

12:51 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Some people ARE having healthy debate here; But other people are stooping to snide personal remarks, such as "...I suspect you are used to being wrong", and insinuating stupidity in those merely disagreeing, ala "If you believe Linda... I have a bridge to sell you." Could we all, please, keep discussion at a bit more respectable and less condescending level ? True debate does not include snide condescension and personal insult. (Leave that bombastic rudeness to the politicians, please.)

Kate K.

12:27 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Completely apart from the above concerns about what's appropriate, etc.--- Its my recent understanding (perhaps incorrect?) that the usual fees for Monrovia High as well as other MUSD school facilities are far higher than the $5/head audience revenue this event "offered". If this is so, why would/should MUSD rent to this group for less than their stated rates? Just wondering...

Reply
Comment_arrow

sayitisntso

9:41 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

If MUSD had a rental policy in place the price would be there and the price would be paid or not. Right now it seems that we have a superintendent who wants to force her morals on the community by way of what she will or won’t allow us to view. Remember “RENT”
The schools would not be subsiding this event. State law requires this type of event to pay fair rental value.
EDUCATION CODE
SECTION 38130-38139
38134.
(e) In the case of entertainments or meetings where admission fees
are charged or contributions are solicited and the net receipts are
not expended for the welfare of the pupils of the district or for
charitable purposes, a charge shall be levied for the use of school
facilities or grounds which charge shall be equal to fair rental
value.
Kate, if you can’t see the hummer in my comments then I feel sorry for you.
Lighten-up, one hundred years from now this won’t matter anyway, don’t try to force your morals on others or their way of speaking.

Comment_arrow

Ed Gililland

9:31 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

MUSD does have a rental policy in place and sayitisntso has included the appropriate information about the basis for that policy. This type event would have to pay the fair rental value to the District which would be used for the welfare of the students. If the event planners want to include a $5 per ticket donation to the athletic, band, or academic booster clubs at MHS, they would be free to do that in addition to, not instead of the rental charge.

Comment_arrow

Josh

1:58 pm on Friday, October 14, 2011

They would be paying the usual rental fees plus $5 a head

Brenda Winner

4:29 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

That is exactly right sayitisntso. And as far as Bodybuilding competitions being compared to strip clubs and pole dancing is so off base and incorrect. The athletes that compete in these shows are intellectual, disciplined and highly motivated people promoting health and fitness. Discipline is something students of every age need to learn. I work with bodybuilders everyday and I can tell you firsthand these are people who exhibit values and morals that are of the highest standards. To compare them to strippers is an insult. To deny Monrovia the opportunity to hold one of these venues that show the best of the best is a great loss. We support Monrovia schools every year and we work with the students firsthand. Our staff has always been students who work at our gym until they graduate and most even come back to work during their breaks or summer vacations. We teach them the value of good health habits and we feel satisfied that what they have learned from us is something they will carry for the rest of their lives.

Reply

Raymond Aguirre

10:11 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

To Ed Gilliland,
Sorry to hear you feel Nathan likes to create conflict, but that is clearly not the case. The publics perseption is reality as we can all agree on, and when the MUSD board drags it's knuckles and refuses to respond to requests for information in a timely manner, well then MUSD has created conflict by not answering local media groups questions in its entirety. You are doing a great job Nathan, I cannot say the same for MUSD's board.

Reply

sayitisntso

12:00 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Ed Gililland,
When I spoke with the district office I was told that no rental policy existed but that the board was currently working on developing one. That was also confirmed by a member of the MUSD board prior to my posting. Many different stories. If there is not one then shame on the Superintendent for not having the board development one when she took office.

Reply

Jean R.

12:35 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

I have seen the students leaving the campus. Most of the "students" have inappropriate clothing. I think a little common since is in order here

Reply

Ed Gililland

9:13 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

The Board Policy is Number 1330 (Use of School Facilities). A policy has been in effect for many years, but the current version was adopted on December 5, 2010. Some revisions have been recommended since that time. The Board is scheduled to consider this policy in November so this discussion is very timely. I am sorry if anyone associated with MUSD gave any information that this policy did not exist.
I would also like to address the comment that the campus was just renovated and should not need to be painted. The exterior painting of the existing buildings was not done under the modernization contract. We determined that we could save taxpayer money by having a separate contract just for exterior painting after the major construction and modernization contracts were completed. That is well documented in previous open meeting minutes. Since the modernization contract was not completed in time for that painting to take place before the start of school this year, the decision was made to do the painting at the end of this school year when the campus could be closed. I hope that clears up those two issues.

Reply

Frank "frazgo" Zgonc

5:40 am on Monday, October 10, 2011

Thank you Ed for clearing up this mess and pointing people where to look for answers.

Reply

sayitisntso

11:32 am on Monday, October 10, 2011

Thanks Ed, I will be requesting a copy of Board Policy, Number 1330, along with the painting and sandblasting contract and event application to help sort out fact from fiction.

Reply

sayitisntso

12:42 pm on Monday, October 10, 2011

Kristin K. Mariconda
Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent

Dear Kris,
I am making a request, to review copies of the following documents per our conversation 10/10/2011:
1. Board Policy, Number 1330
2. The painting and sandblasting contract for the High School that conflicts with Bodybuilding Event rental application
3. The Bodybuilding Event application to rent High School facilities
Thank you,
Cyrus Kemp

Reply

sayitisntso

2:13 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ed, it seems that a lot of misinformation has been put out by MUSD. Let’s look at some facts received by me through an information request at MUSD.

Application date 9/22/2011

Event date 6/23/2012

June 8, 2012 Last Day of School (K­12)

In an email from the District Office - “A copy of the contract for sandblasting and painting at MHS during the time requested by West Coast Classic is not available because the District has not gone out to bid yet for this work.”

After reading, Board Policy 1330, reviewing the date of the event and seeing that the Sandblasting, Painting is not scheduled or even put out to bid I see no reason that this event and the revenue it would have brought the MUSD was denied, except for the personal tastes of the Superintendent to the detriment of the District. The work would have over two months to be completed after the event was held and could be put out to bid for that time frame.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry Baker

2:32 pm on Thursday, October 13, 2011

Ask them for a copy of the RFP for the project. That will tell you if, in fact, they requested that the work be performed on those dates. It's also interesting that the school district seems to know the winner of a contract that hasn't even been bid yet.

Comment_arrow

Ed Gililland

10:09 pm on Saturday, October 15, 2011

Cyrus (Sayitisntso),
Per your request, we'll have this on the agenda for Oct. 26. The discussion will be done in public and recorded for KGEM. I’m not sure where the idea came from that we had a signed contract or know who the contractor will be. If my comment was interpreted to say that, I apologize for the confusion. I said it is scheduled for that time period, not that it was already contracted. We typically advertise and award these contracts closer to the date the work will actually be done. This will be a very large contract to put the finishing touches on the refurbishment of MHS. It has been openly planned in public meetings for the last two years. I will make sure that timing, work to be done, anticipated schedule and anticipated cost will be part of the discussion on the 26th. In compliance with the Open Meeting Act (Brown Act), the Board will not be having private discussion of this issue prior to the open meeting at which it will be considered.

Leave a comment