.
Feedback

Early Monrovia Women in Real Estate

At the time that Monrovia was becoming a city, its women had surprisingly impressive and vast real estate holdings.

A look at the history of women’s rights reveals that until fairly recently (and, some might argue, not even then), women have taken a backseat to men when it comes to matters of equal rights. 

Women did not secure the right to vote in the United States until 1920, and even today in some parts of the world wives are considered the “property” of their husbands. So it is all the more surprising to learn that early Monrovia women held large amounts of land in the developing city during a time when men were the family breadwinners and usually handled the household finances.

Most references to women in early Monrovia in newspapers and other publications were to things we would consider typical for the age and time, namely appropriate “lady like” pursuits. Maintaining the interior of the home, hosting social gatherings, and involvement in bringing a library to town were standard fare for the women of the day. After all, it was Mrs. J.F. Harvey who was given credit for the beautiful appointments in her home, not her husband.

Mrs. Anna M. Spence was probably the most land wealthy woman in Monrovia prior to 1900. She was the widow of E.F. Spence, a former mayor of Los Angeles and one of three others along with William N. Monroe who combined their holdings to form the original 240 acres that was to become the town site of Monrovia. In the 1893 Assessment Book of Property of Monrovia, Mrs. Spence held 371 pieces of property worth $53,595 (land value only)!

While a typical lot would have measured 50 feet by 150 feet, some lots were considerably larger. One can imagine the feeling of empowerment Mrs. Spence must have felt as she drove around those areas of town where much of the land she saw belonged to her. Today such a situation would not be considered unusual but back then women did not usually move in the same circles as men.

Mrs. Spence may have been exceptional in her land holdings, but she was far from being an isolated case. While many of these land-rich women were widows and inherited much of their holdings from their husbands, there were also a number of single, unmarried women who were able to acquire numerous pieces of land in the developing city. 

The 1892 Assessment Book listed 607 entries of land owners (this does not count the owners listed as “Unknown”, a category necessary due to the frequency with which land was changing hands at this time), of which 105 were women. It should be noted that some of the owners of property were listed as businesses, and in many cases each entry would have included multiple pieces of land.

 

The movement of women towards a more equal footing with men did not originate in Monrovia.  But the women who were part of the early town certainly viewed their role in the community with a more progressive outlook.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monrovia Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ellen Zunino May 19, 2013 at 01:37 pm
I kind of lost interest when, along with the Lion's barbecue, the carnival disappeared but thereRead More were always people I knew in the parade so I kept the date. Now that the parade is gone, it's just another festival day in town. Times change and this kind of under-stated event is what people want. The old Monrovia Days used to be a day we could all get together and have fun. Now, people are too busy with their own lives and "community" doesn't mean what it once did.
rubberband May 19, 2013 at 01:09 pm
Interesting. There was one person who decided that letting Monrovia Day slide with nothing doneRead More wasn't gonna play. BY HERSELF and her family and friends planned all of it and set everything up. That person was Keely Milliken. It was astounding how much got done, and without financial support or the usual cast of players to do anything. There were many pitfalls, permits that needed approval and what not...Perhaps if you voiced your displeasure to the City Council and volunteered your personal money and weeks of planning and organizing you'd feel a lot better about it. I can say with absolute conviction that Keely should hold her head high, and I was glad to be a part of it. With almost no money, the people that volunteered their time and efforts are not ashamed, but rather glad that at last minute a albeit mellower version, something nice was created. Sometimes being able to apologize is the biggest most wonderful quality a human can have. I am wrong, often, but not on this one. Great job Keely and family/friends. Thank you for all the hard work.
K. Eckstrom May 19, 2013 at 10:46 am
Danielle, you can call City Hall and they will direct you to the correct people. These peopleRead More worked hard to plan this with what little money we have.
Mike Day May 17, 2013 at 09:56 pm
Thanks for the compliments. mor video to follow
Buzlightyear aka marty May 17, 2013 at 07:37 pm
Yeah, it's cute...... For now......
Ellen Zunino May 17, 2013 at 01:02 pm
Cool presentation. Many of us have had our own encounters and all of us have seen numerous photosRead More and videos so your creative approach freshened it up for us.
Dan Crandell May 16, 2013 at 09:28 pm
A California city will never prevail in a lawsuit against the STATE. All CA. cities must merge toRead More sue in mass under Federal RICO laws while we still have Federal laws. Filing alone at the State level is useless. Wake up people.