Monrovia’s Potential Landmark List

Created as a result of a historic resources survey in 1995, the list identifies most of the notable structures in the city.

By now most residents of Monrovia are aware of the fact that structures within the city can be locally identified as a landmark (landmarks of the State of California and National Register designations are distinct and separate). 

Currently, Monrovia has created 127 landmarks (126 are structures, with the Boxx Jewelers clock the only exception). What a lot of people may not know is that there is also another list of buildings on what is referred to as the “potential landmark list.”

In 1985 thirty-nine Monrovia volunteers, with partial funding by the State Office of Historic Preservation, conducted a survey of pre-1920 homes in Monrovia.  They were able to identify 66 existing structures that appeared to qualify for entry onto the National Register. 

Then in the late 1980s the Monrovia Historic Preservation Group (MOHPG, but then was known as the Monrovia Old House Preservation Group) began their own historic resources survey in an effort to identify the more significant structures in the city. That survey listed approximately 2400 homes that appeared to be of pre-1930s vintage. 

In the 1990s the City of Monrovia appointed a Historic Resources Survey Committee, although no residents of Monrovia were on the committee. That committee then compiled a list of buildings that could potentially be landmarked. The list was derived from three sources:  (1) buildings that up to that point had been part of MOHPG’s Mother’s Day home tours; (2) homes listed in Volumes 1 and 2 of T. Myron Hotchkiss’ books, Monrovia’s Heritage; and (3) homes identified on the 1985 survey.

The “Potential Historic Landmarks” list of 157 structures was approved by the City Council in 1995. The properties on the list “were deemed to have historic value” and were considered to be potentially landmarkable. The resolution by the Council gave the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) “advisory review authority over proposed changes and demolitions” to the buildings on the list. 

Usually, this is no big deal if the owner is trying to do the “right thing.” Some of the items not requiring review by the HPC were alterations of the following type: repairing/replacing materials with like kind, accessory structures, fencing, and incidental appurtenances such as awnings or shutters.

Today only 45 of the 157 structures on the potential landmark list have been landmarked by the City Council. That means that 81 buildings which have been landmarked do not appear on that list. The fact that so many landmark applications have been granted to homes or buildings not on the potential list prompts the question: Should these buildings have been included on the original list? Are there other buildings that belong on the list and should the list be revised?

The exact process used to determine which structures were or were not added to the potential landmark list is not known. But in the opinion of this author the list should be updated for a very simple reason: A significant structure not on the list has almost no protection from alteration. As a result the losses we have seen to our architectural heritage in the past could continue unless we have exercised due diligence by updating the buildings on the list.

A special thanks to Ili Lobaco and Craig Jimenez for supplying some of the factual information in this article.

Carmen Martinez July 23, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Where can we find this list?
sarah July 23, 2012 at 01:54 PM
There are some duplexs on Encinitas just below Foothill that are turn of the century that should be on the list.
Gayle M. Montgomery July 23, 2012 at 09:28 PM
How does this work, Jim? Are the City and the owners in communication to know which homes are in jeopardy of losing landmark status if modified in a way not in keeping with historic standards? Does a home owner/realtor have an opportunity to disclose before a property is sold (a convenants and restrictions type document)? I love preservation of historic resources, but I could see a real battle between home owners and preservationists (not uncommon in my dealings with folks in the museum world). If a property is deeded historic and requires specific types of materials in renovations, does the City assist the home owner in determining where such materials can be found at perhaps a negotiated price? Beyond the Habitat for Humanity Restores where one would ferret, are there existing lists? And the fact that certain homes did not achieve status, do we know if this is home owner intransigence, or ???
Henry Gray July 23, 2012 at 10:28 PM
Maybe the city's planning department can screen rehabilitation and demolition permits to identify when potentially significant properties may be about to under go renovations and then apply historically compatible design guidelines as a way of ensuring such resources may be preserved.
Jim Wigton July 23, 2012 at 10:35 PM
The "Potential Historic Landmarks" list is available at City Hall. Go to the Building Department and ask for one.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »