.
Feedback

UPDATE: Lawsuit Settlement Gives Land and $610,000 to Developer

The city would essentially hand developer Samuelson & Fetter land for free and pay the developer a total of $610,000 under the terms of a settlement agreement that the City Council will review in a special meeting next week.

The City Council will decide Monday whether to enter into a settlement agreement that would compel the city to pay Samuelson & Fetter $610,000 and and essentially give the developer land for free.

The council will consider the terms in a special meeting after they were agreed to by attorneys for both parties. The council must still vote to approve the agreement, which must then be approved by a judge.

The agreement calls on the city to pay Samuelson & Fetter $2.78 million and then sell a lot of land east of Magnolia Avenue and south of Pomona Avenue to the developer for the exact same amount--$2.78 million, according to Councilman Tom Adams.

"The city ... is paying Samuelson & Fetter $2.78 million to terminate the lawsuit," Adams explained. "And then we sell the land to Samuelson & Fetter for $2.78 million. Basically we're giving them the land for free."

Additionally, the city must pay $510,000 to the developer and up to $100,000 for environmental insurance premiums on the land, according to the settlement agreement.

The payments were agreed upon in the city's original development agreement with Samuelson & Fetter, according to City Manager Laurie Lile.

"The development agreement had some provisions for reimbursement ... for some of their costs for development of the Station Square Design Plans," Lile said. "There is no reason not to do the reimbursement."

The money comes from the budget of the successor agency to the city's redevelopment agency, which was eliminated by the state last year. If the council approves the settlement, it must then be approved on Wednesday by an oversight committee set up to handle the agency's finances. The state Department of Finance must also sign off on the agreement.

Lile said the city decided to settle because it did not want to continue to spend money fighting the lawsuit.

"I think, from our perspective, challenging the lawsuit in court and litigation--it is not very productive," she said. "It is very expensive and time consuming."

The settlement agreement stems from a $106 million lawsuit filed by the developer against the city in August alleging the city breached a development contract. The land specified in the agreement will be developed as part of the Station Square Transit Village project and will house a Gold Line parking facility.

Blaine Fetter, a principal at Samuelson & Fetter, could not be reached for comment on this story.

Clarification: A previous version of this story stated that Samuelson & Fetter would pay $2.78 million for the land but did not mention that the city would give the developer the same amount of money. We regret the misunderstanding.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monrovia Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ellen Zunino May 19, 2013 at 01:37 pm
I kind of lost interest when, along with the Lion's barbecue, the carnival disappeared but thereRead More were always people I knew in the parade so I kept the date. Now that the parade is gone, it's just another festival day in town. Times change and this kind of under-stated event is what people want. The old Monrovia Days used to be a day we could all get together and have fun. Now, people are too busy with their own lives and "community" doesn't mean what it once did.
rubberband May 19, 2013 at 01:09 pm
Interesting. There was one person who decided that letting Monrovia Day slide with nothing doneRead More wasn't gonna play. BY HERSELF and her family and friends planned all of it and set everything up. That person was Keely Milliken. It was astounding how much got done, and without financial support or the usual cast of players to do anything. There were many pitfalls, permits that needed approval and what not...Perhaps if you voiced your displeasure to the City Council and volunteered your personal money and weeks of planning and organizing you'd feel a lot better about it. I can say with absolute conviction that Keely should hold her head high, and I was glad to be a part of it. With almost no money, the people that volunteered their time and efforts are not ashamed, but rather glad that at last minute a albeit mellower version, something nice was created. Sometimes being able to apologize is the biggest most wonderful quality a human can have. I am wrong, often, but not on this one. Great job Keely and family/friends. Thank you for all the hard work.
K. Eckstrom May 19, 2013 at 10:46 am
Danielle, you can call City Hall and they will direct you to the correct people. These peopleRead More worked hard to plan this with what little money we have.
Mike Day May 17, 2013 at 09:56 pm
Thanks for the compliments. mor video to follow
Buzlightyear aka marty May 17, 2013 at 07:37 pm
Yeah, it's cute...... For now......
Ellen Zunino May 17, 2013 at 01:02 pm
Cool presentation. Many of us have had our own encounters and all of us have seen numerous photosRead More and videos so your creative approach freshened it up for us.
Dan Crandell May 16, 2013 at 09:28 pm
A California city will never prevail in a lawsuit against the STATE. All CA. cities must merge toRead More sue in mass under Federal RICO laws while we still have Federal laws. Filing alone at the State level is useless. Wake up people.